// CODE SNIPPET

# Section A506 Tier 2 Analysis Procedure

JUMP TO FULL CODE CHAPTER

A Tier 2 analysis includes an analysis using the following linear methods: Static or equivalent lateral force procedures. A linear dynamic analysis may be used to determine the distribution of the base shear over the height of the structure. The analysis, as a minimum, shall address all potential deficiencies identified in Tier 1, using procedures specified in this section.

If a Tier 2 analysis identifies a nonconforming condition, such condition shall be modified to conform to the acceptance criteria. Alternatively, the design professional may choose to perform a Tier 3 analysis to verify the adequacy of the structure.

If a Tier 2 analysis identifies a nonconforming condition, such condition shall be modified to conform to the acceptance criteria. Alternatively, the design professional may choose to perform a Tier 3 analysis to verify the adequacy of the structure.

A Tier 2 analysis procedure may be used if:

- There is no in-plane offset in the lateral force-resisting system.
- There is no out-of-plane offset in the lateral force-resisting system.
- There is no torsional irregularity present in any story. A torsional irregularity may be deemed to exist in a story when the maximum story drift, computed including accidental torsion, at one end of the structure transverse to an axis is more than 1.2 times the average of the story drifts at the two ends of the structure.
- There is no weak story irregularity at any floor level on any axis of the building. A weak story is one in which the story strength is less than 80 percent of that in the story above. The story strength is the total strength of all seismic-resisting elements sharing the story shear for the direction under consideration.

Exception: Static or equivalent lateral force procedures shall not be used if:

- The building is more than 100 feet (30 480 mm) in height.
- The building has a vertical mass or stiffness irregularity (soft story). Mass irregularity shall be considered to exist where the effective mass of any story is more than 150 percent of the effective mass of any adjacent story. A soft story is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than 70 percent of that in the story above or less than 80 percent of the average stiffness of the three stories above.
- The building has a vertical geometric irregularity. Vertical geometric irregularity shall be considered to exist where the horizontal dimension of the lateral force-resisting system in any story is more than 130 percent of that in an adjacent story.
- The building has a nonorthogonal lateral force-resisting system.

A structural analysis shall be performed for all structures in accordance with the requirements of the building code, except as modified in Section A506. The response modification factor,

*R*, shall be selected based on the type of seismic force-resisting system employed and shall comply with the requirements of Section 301.1.4.1.The three-dimensional mathematical model of the physical structure shall represent the spatial distribution of mass and stiffness of the structure to an extent that is adequate for the calculation of the significant features of its distribution of lateral forces. All concrete and masonry elements shall be included in the model of the physical structure.

Cast-in-place reinforced concrete floors with span-todepth ratios less than three-to-one may be assumed to be rigid diaphragms. Other floors, including floors constructed of precast elements with or without a reinforced concrete topping, shall be analyzed in conformance to the building code to determine if they must be considered semi-rigid diaphragms. The effective in-plane stiffness of the diaphragm, including effects of cracking and discontinuity between precast elements, shall be considered. Parking structures that have ramps rather than a single floor level shall be modeled as having mass appropriately distributed on each ramp. The lateral stiffness of the ramp may be calculated as having properties based on the uncracked cross section of the slab exclusive of beams and girders.

Exception: Concrete or masonry partitions that are isolated from the concrete frame members and the floor above.

Cast-in-place reinforced concrete floors with span-todepth ratios less than three-to-one may be assumed to be rigid diaphragms. Other floors, including floors constructed of precast elements with or without a reinforced concrete topping, shall be analyzed in conformance to the building code to determine if they must be considered semi-rigid diaphragms. The effective in-plane stiffness of the diaphragm, including effects of cracking and discontinuity between precast elements, shall be considered. Parking structures that have ramps rather than a single floor level shall be modeled as having mass appropriately distributed on each ramp. The lateral stiffness of the ramp may be calculated as having properties based on the uncracked cross section of the slab exclusive of beams and girders.

Component stiffness shall be calculated based on the approximate values shown in ASCE 41 Table 10-5.

The design and detailing of new components of the seismic force-resisting system shall comply with the requirements of the

*International Building Code*, unless specifically modified herein.The calculated strength of a member shall be not less than the load effects on that member.

For load and resistance factor design (strength design), structures and all portions thereof shall resist the most critical effects from the combinations of factored loads prescribed in the building code.

where:

Exception: For concrete beams and columns, the shear effect shall be determined based on the most critical load combinations prescribed in the building code. The shear load effect, because of seismic forces, shall be multiplied by a factor of

*Cd,*but combined shear load effect need not be greater than*Ve*, as calculated in accordance with Equation A5-4.*M*and_{pr1}*M*are the end moments, assumed to be in the same direction (clockwise or counter clockwise), based on steel tensile stress being equal to 1.25_{pr2 }*f*, where_{y}*f*is the specified yield strength._{y}where:

W_{g} |
= | Total gravity loads on the beam |

The strength of a member shall be determined by multiplying the nominal strength of the member by a strength reduction factor, ϕ. The nominal strength of the member shall be determined in accordance with the building code.

### Related Code Sections

Section A506 A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings, Tier 2 Analysis Procedure

A

*Tier**2**analysis*includes an*analysis*using the following linear methods: Static or equivalent lateral force*procedures*. A linear dynamic*analysis*...
Existing Building Code of Massachusetts > A5 A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings > A506 Tier 2 Analysis Procedure

Section A506 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings, Tier 2 Analysis Procedure

A

*Tier**2**analysis*includes an*analysis*using the following linear methods: Static or equivalent lateral force*procedures*. A linear dynamic*analysis*...
Existing Building Code of Massachusetts > A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings > A506 Tier 2 Analysis Procedure

A506.4 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings, Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects

The design and detailing of new components of the seismic force-resisting system shall comply with the requirements of the International Building ...

Existing Building Code of Massachusetts > A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings > A506 Tier 2 Analysis Procedure > A506.4 Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects

A506.5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings, Acceptance Criteria

The calculated strength of a member shall be not less than the load effects on that member ...

Existing Building Code of Massachusetts > A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings > A506 Tier 2 Analysis Procedure > A506.5 Acceptance Criteria

A506.2 A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings, Limitations

A

*Tier**2**analysis**procedure*may be used if: There is no in-plane offset in the lateral-force-resisting system. There is no out-of-plane offset ...
Existing Building Code of Massachusetts > A5 A5 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Concrete Buildings > A506 Tier 2 Analysis Procedure > A506.2 Limitations