// CODE SNIPPET
Section 1620 Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects
JUMP TO FULL CODE CHAPTER
The design and detailing of the components of the seismic-force-resisting system shall comply with the requirements of Section 9.5.2.6 of ASCE 7 in addition to the nonseismic requirements of this code except as modified in Sections 1620.1.1, 1620.1.2 and 1620.1.3.
Exception: For structures designed using the simplified analysis procedure in Section 1617.5, the provisions of Sections 1620.2 through 1620.5 shall be used.
Section 9.5.2.6.2.5 of ASCE 7 shall not apply.
Modify ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.2.11, to read as follows:
9.5.2.6.2.11 Elements supporting discontinuous walls or frames. Columns, beams, trusses or slabs supporting discontinuous walls or frames of structures and the connections of the discontinuous element to the supporting member having plan irregularity Type 4 of Table 9.5.2.3.2 or vertical irregularity Type 4 of Table 9.5.2.3.3 shall have the design strength to resist the maximum axial force that can develop in accordance with the special seismic loads of Section 9.5.2.7.1.
9.5.2.6.2.11 Elements supporting discontinuous walls or frames. Columns, beams, trusses or slabs supporting discontinuous walls or frames of structures and the connections of the discontinuous element to the supporting member having plan irregularity Type 4 of Table 9.5.2.3.2 or vertical irregularity Type 4 of Table 9.5.2.3.3 shall have the design strength to resist the maximum axial force that can develop in accordance with the special seismic loads of Section 9.5.2.7.1.
Exceptions:
- The quantity E in Section 9.5.2.7.1 need not exceed the maximum force that can be transmitted to the element by the lateral-force-resisting system at yield.
- Concrete slabs supporting light-framed walls.
Modify ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.3, to read as follows:
9.5.2.6.3 Seismic Design Category C. Structures assigned to Category C shall conform to the requirements of Section 9.5.2.6.2 for Category B and to the requirements of this section. Structures that have plan structural irregularity Type 1a or 1b of Table 9.5.2.3.2 along both principal plan axes, or plan structural irregularity Type 5 of Table 9.5.2.3.2, shall be analyzed for seismic forces in compliance with Section 9.5.2.5.2.2. When the square root of the sum of the squares method of combining directional effects is used,each term computed shall be assigned the sign that will yield the most conservative result.
The orthogonal combination procedure of Section 9.5.2.5.2.2, Item a, shall be required for any column or wall that forms part of two or more intersecting seismic-force-resisting systems and is subjected to axial load due to seismic forces acting along either principal plan axis equaling or exceeding 20 percent of the axial load design strength of the column or wall.
9.5.2.6.3 Seismic Design Category C. Structures assigned to Category C shall conform to the requirements of Section 9.5.2.6.2 for Category B and to the requirements of this section. Structures that have plan structural irregularity Type 1a or 1b of Table 9.5.2.3.2 along both principal plan axes, or plan structural irregularity Type 5 of Table 9.5.2.3.2, shall be analyzed for seismic forces in compliance with Section 9.5.2.5.2.2. When the square root of the sum of the squares method of combining directional effects is used,each term computed shall be assigned the sign that will yield the most conservative result.
The orthogonal combination procedure of Section 9.5.2.5.2.2, Item a, shall be required for any column or wall that forms part of two or more intersecting seismic-force-resisting systems and is subjected to axial load due to seismic forces acting along either principal plan axis equaling or exceeding 20 percent of the axial load design strength of the column or wall.
The design and detailing of the components of the seismic-force-resisting system for structures designed using the simplified analysis procedure in Section 1617.5 shall comply with the requirements of this section in addition to the nonseismic requirements of this code. Buildings shall not exceed the limitations of Section 1616.6.1.
Exception: Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category B (see Section 1616) shall conform to Sections 1620.2.1 through 1620.2.10.
Where openings occur in shear walls, diaphragms or other plate-type elements, reinforcement at the edges of the openings shall be designed to transfer the stresses into the structure. The edge reinforcement shall extend into the body of the wall or diaphragm a distance sufficient to develop the force in the reinforcement.
Structures with a discontinuity in lateral capacity, vertical irregularity Type 5, as defined in Table 1616.5.1.2, shall not be over two stories or 30 feet (9144 mm) in height where the "weak" story has a calculated strength of less than 65 percent of the story above.
Exception: Where the "weak" story is capable of resisting a total seismic force equal to the over-strength factor, Ωo, as given in Table 1617.6.2, multiplied by the design force prescribed in Section 1617.5, the height limitation does not apply.
All parts of the structure, except at separation joints, shall be interconnected and the connections shall be designed to resist the seismic force, Fp, induced by the parts being connected. Any smaller portion of the structure shall be tied to the remainder of the structure for the greater of:
or
A positive connection for resisting a horizontal force acting parallel to the member shall be provided for each beam, girder or truss to its support for a force not less than 5 percent of the dead plus live load reaction.
Fp = 0.133 SDSwp
(Equation 16-58)
or
Fp = 0.05 wp
(Equation 16-59)
SDS | = | The design, 5-percent damped, spectral response acceleration at short periods as defined in Section 1615. |
wp | = | The weight of the smaller portion. |
A positive connection for resisting a horizontal force acting parallel to the member shall be provided for each beam, girder or truss to its support for a force not less than 5 percent of the dead plus live load reaction.
Permissible deflection shall be that deflection up to which the diaphragm and any attached distributing or resisting element will maintain its structural integrity under design load conditions, such that the resisting element will continue to support design loads without danger to occupants of the structure.
Floor and roof diaphragms shall be designed to resist Fp as follows:
where:
Diaphragms shall provide for both shear and bending stresses resulting from these forces. Diaphragms shall have ties or struts to distribute the wall anchorage forces into the diaphragm. Diaphragm connections shall be positive, mechanical or welded-type connections.
Floor and roof diaphragms shall be designed to resist Fp as follows:
F p = 0.2 IESDSw p + Vpx
(Equation 16-60)
where:
Fp | = | The seismic force induced by the parts. |
IE | = | Occupancy importance factor (Table 1604.5). |
SDS | = | The short-period site design spectral response acceleration coefficient (Section 1615). |
wp | = | The weight of the diaphragm and other elements of the structure attached to the diaphragm. |
V px | = | The portion of the seismic shear force at the level of the diaphragm, required to be transferred to the components of the vertical seismic-force-resisting system because of the offsets or changes in stiffness of the vertical components above or below the diaphragm. |
Diaphragms shall provide for both shear and bending stresses resulting from these forces. Diaphragms shall have ties or struts to distribute the wall anchorage forces into the diaphragm. Diaphragm connections shall be positive, mechanical or welded-type connections.
Collector elements shall be provided that are capable of transferring the seismic forces originating in other portions of the structure to the element providing the resistance to those forces. Collector elements, splices and their connections to resisting elements shall have the design strength to resist the special load combinations of Section 1605.4.
Exception: In structures or portions thereof braced entirely by light-framed shear walls, collector elements, splices and connections to resisting elements need only have the strength to resist the load combinations of Section 1605.2 or 1605.3.
Bearing walls and shear walls and their anchorage shall be designed for an out-of-plane force, Fp that is the greater of 10 percent of the weight of the wall, or the quantity given by Equation 16-61:
where:
In addition, concrete and masonry walls shall be anchored to the roof and floors and members that provide lateral support for the wall or that are supported by the wall. The anchorage shall provide a direct connection between the wall and the supporting construction capable of resisting the greater of the force, Fp as given by Equation 16-6 1 or(400 SDS IE) pounds per linear foot of wall. For SI: 5838 SDSIEN/m. Walls shall be designed to resist bending between anchors where the anchor spacing exceeds 4 feet (1219 mm). Parapets shall conform to the requirements of Section 9.6.2.2 of ASCE 7.
Fp = 0.40 IESDSww
(Equation 16-61)
where:
IE | = | Occupancy importance factor (Table 1604.5). |
SDS | = | The short-period site design spectral response acceleration coefficient (Section 1615.1.3 or 1615.2.5). |
ww | = | The weight of the wall. |
In addition, concrete and masonry walls shall be anchored to the roof and floors and members that provide lateral support for the wall or that are supported by the wall. The anchorage shall provide a direct connection between the wall and the supporting construction capable of resisting the greater of the force, Fp as given by Equation 16-6 1 or(400 SDS IE) pounds per linear foot of wall. For SI: 5838 SDSIEN/m. Walls shall be designed to resist bending between anchors where the anchor spacing exceeds 4 feet (1219 mm). Parapets shall conform to the requirements of Section 9.6.2.2 of ASCE 7.
Supporting columns or piers of inverted pendulum-type structures shall be designed for the bending moment calculated at the base determined using the procedures given in Section 1617.4 and varying uniformly to a moment at the top equal to one-half the calculated bending moment at the base.
Columns or other elements subject to vertical reactions from discontinuous walls or frames of structures having plan irregularity Type 4 of Table 1616.5.1.1 or vertical irregularity Type 4 of Table 1616.5.1.2 shall have the design strength to resist special seismic load combinations of Section 1605.4. The connections from the discontinuous walls or frames to the supporting elements need not have the design strength to resist the special seismic load combinations of Section 1605.4.
Exceptions:
- The quantity, Em, in Section 1617.1.1.2 need not exceed the maximum force that can be transmitted to the element by the lateral-force-resisting system at yield.
- Concrete slabs supporting light-framed walls.
The direction of application of seismic forces used in design shall be that which will produce the most critical load effect in each component. The requirement will be deemed satisfied if the design seismic forces are applied separately and independently in each of the two orthogonal directions.
Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C (see Section 1616) shall conform to the requirements of Section 1620.2 for Seismic Design Category B and to Sections 1620.3.1 through 1620.3.2.
Concrete or masonry walls shall be anchored to floors and roofs and members that provide out-of-plane lateral support for the wall or that are supported by the wall. The anchorage shall provide a positive direct connection between the wall and floor or roof capable of resisting the horizontal forces specified in Equation 16-62 for structures with flexible diaphragms or in Section 9.6.1.3 of ASCE 7 (using ap of 1.0 and Rp of 2.5) for structures with diaphragms that are not flexible.
where:
Diaphragms shall be provided with continuous ties or struts between diaphragm chords to distribute these anchorage forces into the diaphragms. Where added chords are used to form subdiaphragms, such chords shall transmit the anchorage forces to the main cross ties. The maximum length-to-width ratio of the structural subdiaphragm shall be 21/2 to 1. Connections and anchorages capable of resisting the prescribed forces shall be provided between the diaphragm and the attached components. Connections shall extend into the diaphragms a sufficient distance to develop the force transferred into the diaphragm.
The strength design forces for steel elements of the wall anchorage system shall be 1.4 times the force otherwise required by this section.
In wood diaphragms, the continuous ties shall be in addition to the diaphragm sheathing. Anchorage shall not be accomplished by use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal, nor shall wood ledgers or framing be used in cross-grain bending or cross-grain tension. The diaphragm sheathing shall not be considered effective as providing the ties or struts required by this section.
In metal deck diaphragms, the metal deck shall not be used as the continuous ties required by this section in the direction perpendicular to the deck span.
Diaphragm-to-wall anchorage using embedded straps shall be attached to or hooked around the reinforcing steel or otherwise terminated so as to directly transfer force to the reinforcing steel.
Fp = 0.8 SDSIEww
(Equation 16-62)
where:
Fp | = | The design force in the individual anchors. |
IE | = | Occupancy importance factor in accordance with Section 1616.2. |
SDS | = | The design earthquake spectral response acceleration at short period in accordance with Section 1615.1.3. |
ww | = | The weight of the wall tributary to the anchor. |
Diaphragms shall be provided with continuous ties or struts between diaphragm chords to distribute these anchorage forces into the diaphragms. Where added chords are used to form subdiaphragms, such chords shall transmit the anchorage forces to the main cross ties. The maximum length-to-width ratio of the structural subdiaphragm shall be 21/2 to 1. Connections and anchorages capable of resisting the prescribed forces shall be provided between the diaphragm and the attached components. Connections shall extend into the diaphragms a sufficient distance to develop the force transferred into the diaphragm.
The strength design forces for steel elements of the wall anchorage system shall be 1.4 times the force otherwise required by this section.
In wood diaphragms, the continuous ties shall be in addition to the diaphragm sheathing. Anchorage shall not be accomplished by use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal, nor shall wood ledgers or framing be used in cross-grain bending or cross-grain tension. The diaphragm sheathing shall not be considered effective as providing the ties or struts required by this section.
In metal deck diaphragms, the metal deck shall not be used as the continuous ties required by this section in the direction perpendicular to the deck span.
Diaphragm-to-wall anchorage using embedded straps shall be attached to or hooked around the reinforcing steel or otherwise terminated so as to directly transfer force to the reinforcing steel.
For structures that have plan structural irregularity Type 1a or 1b of Table 1616.5.1.1 along both principal plan axes, or plan structural irregularity Type 5in Table 1616.5.1.1, the critical direction requirement of Section 1620.2.10 shall be deemed satisfied if components and their foundations are designed for the following orthogonal combination of prescribed loads.
One hundred percent of the forces for one direction plus 30 percent of the forces for the perpendicular direction. The combination requiring the maximum component strength shall be used. Alternatively, the effects of the two orthogonal directions are permitted to be combined on a square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) basis. When the SRSS method of combining directional effects is used, each term computed shall be assigned the sign that will result in the most conservative result.
The orthogonal combination procedure above shall be required for any column or wall that forms part of two or more intersecting seismic-force-resisting systems and is subjected to axial load due to seismic forces acting along either principal plan axis equaling or exceeding 20 percent of the axial load design strength of the column or wall.
One hundred percent of the forces for one direction plus 30 percent of the forces for the perpendicular direction. The combination requiring the maximum component strength shall be used. Alternatively, the effects of the two orthogonal directions are permitted to be combined on a square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) basis. When the SRSS method of combining directional effects is used, each term computed shall be assigned the sign that will result in the most conservative result.
The orthogonal combination procedure above shall be required for any column or wall that forms part of two or more intersecting seismic-force-resisting systems and is subjected to axial load due to seismic forces acting along either principal plan axis equaling or exceeding 20 percent of the axial load design strength of the column or wall.
Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D shall conform to the requirements of Section 1620.3 for Seismic Design Category C and to Sections 1620.4.1 through 1620.4.6.
For buildings having a plan structural irregularity of Type 1a, 1b, 2, 3or 4 in Table 1616.5.1.1 or a vertical structural irregularity of Type 4 in Table 1616.5.1.2, the design forces determined from Section 1617.5 shall be increased 25 percent for connections of diaphragms to vertical elements and to collectors, and for connections of collectors to the vertical elements.
Exception: When connection design forces are determined using the special seismic load combinations of Section 1605.4.
Related Code Sections
Section 1620 Structural Design, Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects
the most critical load effect in each component. The requirement will be deemed satisfied if the design seismic forces are applied separately ...
NYC Building Code 2008 > 16 Structural Design > 1620 Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects
1620.3.2 Structural Design, Direction of Seismic Load
irregularity Type 5in Table 1616.5.1.1, the critical direction requirement of Section 1620.2.10 shall be deemed satisfied if components and their foundations ...
NYC Building Code 2008 > 16 Structural Design > 1620 Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects > 1620.3 Seismic Design Category C > 1620.3.2 Direction of Seismic Load
1620.1.3 Structural Design, ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.3
Modify ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.3, to read as follows:
9.5.2.6.3 Seismic Design Category C. Structures assigned to Category C shall conform ...
NYC Building Code 2008 > 16 Structural Design > 1620 Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects > 1620.1 Structural Component Design and Detailing > 1620.1.3 ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.3
1620.1.1 Structural Design, ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.2.5
Section 9.5.2.6.2.5 of ASCE 7 shall not apply ...
NYC Building Code 2008 > 16 Structural Design > 1620 Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects > 1620.1 Structural Component Design and Detailing > 1620.1.1 ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.2.5
1620.1.2 Structural Design, ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.2.11
, trusses or slabs supporting discontinuous walls or frames of structures and the connections of the discontinuous element ...
NYC Building Code 2008 > 16 Structural Design > 1620 Earthquake Loads — Design, Detailing Requirements and Structural Component Load Effects > 1620.1 Structural Component Design and Detailing > 1620.1.2 ASCE 7, Section 9.5.2.6.2.11